Koffsky Schwalb LLC
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Mark I. Koffsky
    • Efrem Schwalb
    • Gary Serbin
    • Steven A. Weg
    • Daniel E. Baron
    • Tal S. Benschar
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Intellectual Property
    • Employment Law
    • Real Estate
  • Blog
  • Contact
Phone: (646) 553-1590 | Fax: (646) 553-1591

Beyond The Legalese

Go, Team, Go! How Uniform is a Uniform?

6/19/2016

 
Blue & White Cheerleader Uniform
What do the Knicks, Mets and Islanders have in common with the Florida Gators?  It's not their history or their sports.  Their commonality is two things, or rather, two colors: orange and blue.  At their games, you will see orange and blue like a wave of a two-color rainbow throughout the stadium.
 
But can you copyright an orange and blue color-combo?  And if not the color duo, then perhaps each team's logo, mascot stripes, or other patterns connected with the team's uniforms?
 
The legal question at the heart of apparel copyright is "conceptual separability," which seeks to delineate whether it is possible to separate the specific team-recognized apparel design from the apparel's utilitarian functions. (Apparel is defined as clothing, accessories, baggage, blankets, etc.) If the answer is no, then the apparel copyright could be invalid.
 
Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC, a Sixth Circuit case, provides an example of a real-world dispute on this issue.  Plaintiff Varsity Brands is the world’s largest designer, manufacturer and seller of cheerleading apparel, with five of its many copyrighted cheerleading uniform designs at issue in the suit. Varsity sued Star Athletica for copyright infringement based on the latter’s similarly-designed uniforms.  Here, the question was whether the stripes, patterns and colors that are incorporated into the design of a cheerleading uniform can be identified separately and are capable of existing independently of the uniform’s utilitarian aspect.  In other words, absent stripes, chevrons, patterns, and color blocks, is a cheerleading uniform still a cheerleading uniform, and its branding is standalone?  The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said yes, thus finding Varsity’s copyrights valid. But the Supreme Court has agreed to review the matter.
 
The question remains as to how the Supreme Court will define “utility” versus “brand,” a question still open in the fashion industry despite years of lobbying to protect against so-called copyright "knock-offs."  By the time you next attend a Knicks, Mets, Islanders or Gators game, the Supreme Court may have already defined what is actually the uniform, and what’s just orange and blue.

Picture Copyright


    Categories

    All
    Civil Procedure
    Constitutional Law
    Copyright
    Corporate
    Employment Law
    International
    Internet
    Litigation
    Media
    Patent
    Privacy
    Real Estate
    Software
    Tax Law
    Trademark


    Archives

    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed

     349 Fifth Avenue | Suite 733 | New York, NY 10016 | T: 646.553.1590
  Attorney Advertising | Legal Notices | Privacy Policy
Proudly powered by Weebly