Koffsky Schwalb LLC
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Mark I. Koffsky
    • Efrem Schwalb
    • Gary Serbin
    • Steven A. Weg
    • Daniel E. Baron
    • Tal S. Benschar
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Intellectual Property
    • Employment Law
    • Real Estate
  • Blog
  • Contact
Phone: (646) 553-1590 | Fax: (646) 553-1591

Beyond The Legalese

Why Business Needs to Care Whether the Senate was--or was not--in "Recess"

1/28/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Although I once delivered a lecture on the argument that Administrative Patent Judges were improperly appointed under the Constitution, like most lawyers my practice rarely touches on Constitutional issues.  But a recent decision of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals striking down President Obama's recess appointments because--in the Court's view--the Senate was not in "Recess" has the potential to retroactively invalidate thousands of actions made by U.S. government agencies.  A brief background: while certain Presidential appointments must be confirmed by the Senate, the Constitution provides that the President may make temporary appointments to those positions without Senate confirmation when the Senate is in "Recess."  The argument in this case focused on whether Senate was or was not in "Recess" when President Obama made recess appointments to the National Relations Labor Board in 2012.

What is even more interesting (as pointed out here by John Elwood at The Volokh Conspiracy) is that the D.C. Circuit went on to state in a 2-1 opinion that the recess appointment power is available to the President only if the vacancies in question actually occurred during a recess of the Senate.  This appears to go against almost 200 years of practice as Presidents have made many recess appointments for vacancies that occurred while the Senate was not in recess.  All of a sudden, this arcane dispute between the President and the Congress on the meaning of the word "Recess" calls into question years of government decisions including the recent mortgage rules issues by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The Supreme Court will likely take this case and give us the last word on this.  Stay tuned!

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.



    Categories

    All
    Civil Procedure
    Constitutional Law
    Copyright
    Corporate
    Employment Law
    International
    Internet
    Litigation
    Media
    Patent
    Privacy
    Real Estate
    Software
    Tax Law
    Trademark


    Archives

    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed

     349 Fifth Avenue | Suite 733 | New York, NY 10016 | T: 646.553.1590
  Attorney Advertising | Legal Notices | Privacy Policy
Proudly powered by Weebly